Decision 0017
Provenance-carrying memory; opt-in traces for a fine-tuned tool-use model
Architecture decision record 0017: Provenance-carrying memory; opt-in traces for a fine-tuned tool-use model
Context
“Learning” means two things: this machine remembers, and the species gets better. Memory is also the persistence vector for prompt injection (review).
The three plans
- Grok: short-term session plus an optional long-term store; a fine-tuned tool-use model.
- Fable: not detailed.
- Codex: SQLite + FTS + optional vectors; session/project/user/system layers; never-memory; a memory settings page with search, edit, export, delete.
Decision
SQLite with FTS5 and sqlite-vec, one database per user, vector index versioned by embedding-model
id, forward-only migrations with a snapshot at every activation so a generation rollback never
corrupts a newer database. Layers session, project, owner, machine; never-memory for
secrets. Every row carries provenance; rows derived from untrusted content are never loaded as
instructions; owner-layer writes require confirmation. tacid memory searches, edits, exports and
deletes.
Species learning: opt-in tool-trace collection with a published sanitizer specification and a
bundle shown before upload; tune/ fine-tunes a small Tacid tool-use model added to the registry;
the dataset is licensed CDLA-Permissive-2.0.
Consequences
- Memory is a security surface and is tested by the injection corpus.
- The best local model for running Tacid will be one trained on Tacid.
Alternatives rejected
- Copying user files into an AI database: privacy and provenance disasters.
- A vector database service: a daemon for a problem SQLite solves.